U.S. fails North Korea-like war games - nzwargamer.net

U.S. fails North Korea-like war games

CNN
Views: 33651
Like: 79
Could the U.S. secure North Korea’s nuclear weapons if the regime falls? A new war games scenario is not so optimistic.

93 Comments

  1. Military strategies are one of my hobbies and based of what little there there is to know about north korea and the US military capabilities…I think the US will Lose this battle if their goal is to conquer it rapidly… NK will win because they will use guerrilla tactics (same as Vietnam) to win, not to mention that their equipment is very old but effective and have one of the largest (If not the most) tunneled network of bases and supplies underground that most bunker busters will not get.

  2. Nah, they're cutting military numbers as it is…hopefully this will simmer out once N.Korea finishes playing their games. Worst case they launch something and then get a couple factories bombed and then that's it. America is in rapid decline as a superpower so don't see the draft coming back anytime soon. Shutting bases and see US military as truly only for defense rather than playing world police.

  3. No shit. but the can take the KNOWN enemy nuclear sites Carpet Bomb some if needed clean up the mess later.

  4. American girls and women bow to Justin Bieber, why not start in that

  5. I doubt most of their military will really want to fight for their country once they realize how outclassed they are. I could see most of them surrendering once they realize that most of the world is against them.

  6. I doubt the US alone would be apart of this. The US isn't the only country that wants to secure their nukes.

  7. Think of this he eats 300000000000 dicks for dinner but hes still Hugary So North has to feed him XD 00:10

  8. They forgot to add to the war models, that the army would need several months to learn to dance and sing to Korean karaoke songs, and also learn the phrase, "Please pass the sweet and sour sauce?". In other words, war college scenarios are whatever the war college wants to pivot the student's minds around.

  9. The hell we do! I can't stand that prepubescent little shit! >:(

  10. 52 days and only 80k troops? Are they stupid? Another Vietnam scenario impending if they ever decide to go there.

  11. Behind all the propaganda that Iraq had nuclear weapons, Iran wants nuclear weapons, and North Korea might have nuclear weapons, the truth is that the one and only nation in all of history has ever actually used a nuclear weapon of mass destruction against the civilians of another country is the United States! Don’t hate us, hate the small rich minority that deludes the majority of our citizens and that implement policies that lead to monopoly and human slavery! check out BLACKLISTEDNEWS(.)COM

  12. Yep sure it will take more than a year to secure the country with massive loses.

  13. Republics, democracies are a horrible way to govern a country and always turns into a dictatorship or oligarchy

  14. Do you know how much shit America would receive for doing that with some sites near crowded areas? The UN and probably every health organization would flip out on us.

  15. Ok so it would take 90,000 troops, BUT NOT ALL OURS

  16. We have allies and they would surely send some troops we would not be the only ones

  17. after the war, about 24 million north Koreans will go rogue and fight the u.s. Cause they worship there leader like a god

  18. I was meaning in the extreme. the USA would bomb those sites if they knew the DPRK was trying to move it out.

    " UN and probably every health organization would flip out on us." when was the last time the UN ever did anything except the Korean War. and even then that was U.S led.

  19. Wait… So 56 days for 90,000 troops to take over a country defended by millions of troops is bad? Okay CNN. Whatever you say.

  20. YES ! any one of 28 countries .. RIGHT .. So basically with that argument, if USA wants to capture nuclear sites in case of failed Russia China and India, it looks like it will take USA 56 days and 90,000 troops .. GREAT ANALYSIS . GG.

  21. as much as I would love for us to just nuke north korea, it definitely wouldn't be the smartest idea. we have to play this slow, and be the bigger country. the whole world is watching, and we can't afford to let anybody side with north korea.

  22. That's unprepared troops though, We would send in special forces like DEVGRU to find the nuclear weapons while regular forces just fought. We would also have help from South Korea Chine and NATO helping.

  23. If we go to fight NK I'm only 16 and I know it's not like cod hahaha or anything BUT I WANT IN I WANNA FIGHT I know how to shoot I have an ar15 but the only thing I don't have is military tranjng I wish I could enlist right now so bad

  24. The US isn't going to be alone if Korea did something with a nuclear bomb. The world would crush Korea

  25. If Korea did something nuke,then the whole world will assist it to CRUSH the U.S because most of the nations have grudges against it.
    Korea,japan,iran,the whole muslims,pakistan,russia,india……..blablabla.

  26. WAIT haha Our FIRST move is to send in OSPREY's???

    HAHA LMFAO who came up with that stupid idea? NK hard targets would be relentlessly bombarded from the air and sea before any US boots stepped on the ground. As for what happens afterwards, the US military just needs to stick to what it does best: attack and destroy. Then get the hell out of there. Let our allies, the UN, and IMF deal with the nation building. If they want a peaceful region, the UN can do some heavy lifting on its own for once

  27. What a JOKE! They wouldn't use these tactics. If anything they'd hit them with weather weaponry etc. Thus, having seemingly "natural" events take out most of the country right off the bat. On the same note, China, Russia, Iran etc. can do this as well to the USAcorp. So it's still the M.A.D. scenario anyway you look at it!

  28. And it would be just as illegal and bollocks as the Vietnam one the US was so sure to win 🙂

  29. Hmm yeah not that easy, Korea has China, China has Russia, Russia has Pakistan, etc, etc.

  30. Let's call this what it is, speculation from intelligence gathered by America. America isn't exactly the best at gathering accurate intel. Remember Iraq and the supposed WMDS? How about the estimate it would take 3 weeks to crush Iraq and the soldiers would be home in time for supper? This was a tiny country that had no useful allies and America still lost and is now bankrupt, the citizens are divided making the country even weaker, etc. This has disaster written all over it.

  31. you dont have to win. bomb all farms. bomb all cities. bomb all roads.
    /
    america has the ability to do that easily with stealth planes. the people will flee out of the country. the government will be toppled. samilar shit like Iraq and vietname.

  32. Hmm LOL, yeah but china, Russia, is in the UN too.

  33. I hate to break it to the impatient American people but wars aren't won in a day they can take up to 5 years normally and depending on demographics and logistics it could take 250000 to 300000 soldiers …… deal with if that's what it takes to win a war then so be it victory at any cost

  34. china's not going to do anything to their largest consumer there economy would be gone and Russia, Russia just blows allot of smoke they won't do

  35. They never thought that if America Surges these Countries, They may just Launch their Weapons of Mass Destruction to get them out of The Ground and/or into the air. Then we have the beginning of a Thermonuclear War. I think America should Re-Think what they're doing… Some Leaders do Crazy Stuff when they have nothing to loose…

  36. yea but that 5000 was lost over a span of about 12 years….ya know? N. korea does have a huge military, but their airforce and artillery and such is incredibly outdated.

  37. God it's not all of Korea! It's just the North.

  38. I'm sorry but I can't name a actual war the US has won. Using WMD on Japan is kinda cheating. Throw all the nukes away and attach the bayonet. Men meet on the field of battle, no drones allowed!!

  39. No offence to the military, just the people on the hill can manage a postal system. How can they plan anything. Please

  40. Nice conversation comment you have. Your are a idiot if you believe what you see on tv Mr. Sheep. Calling me names doesn't make you any smarter. You just showed the world I'm right. The US has never had a successful war and are full of people like you. Why don't you research a little history. Land of the coward, home of the slave. So you are the "idiot" my friend.

  41. Just nuke them, there all screwed up in the head anywise.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.